PhilT wrote: It's about 20 - 22.5 BMI in the few cases I calculated, so no different to today really ?
No woman under 55 shall weigh over 11 stone. LOL.
Yes, you are right, for my height/age the BMI is 22.66 so just over the middle range.
Log in to view your messages, post comments, update your blog or tracker.
PhilT wrote: It's about 20 - 22.5 BMI in the few cases I calculated, so no different to today really ?
No woman under 55 shall weigh over 11 stone. LOL.
eckat wrote: I think there is still some scope to slim a bit further and stay in a healthy BMI - and maybe then my thighs wont meet so easily too
Ginty wrote: Glad I get to add 3lbs for every 5yrs over 40!
Food rationing would still be on then so I suppose the temptation wasn't around, no snacking in those days, just 3 healthy meals if you we're one of the lucky ones.
Thanks for posting, makes interesting reading.
Franglaise wrote:eckat wrote: I think there is still some scope to slim a bit further and stay in a healthy BMI - and maybe then my thighs wont meet so easily too
My thighs were still meeting at a BMI of 20 so that is why I wanted to get it down further!
TML13 wrote:Franglaise wrote:eckat wrote: I think there is still some scope to slim a bit further and stay in a healthy BMI - and maybe then my thighs wont meet so easily too
My thighs were still meeting at a BMI of 20 so that is why I wanted to get it down further!
Not to disappoint you but when my mum had a hyperthyroid crisis and lost over 10 kilos in less than 2 weeks (she was 36 kilos) her thighs still met. And my thighs still met when I was at my skinniest possible. Being a pear does that to our thighs.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 191 guests
Be healthier. Lose weight. Eat the foods you love, most of the time.
LEARN ABOUT FASTING
We've got loads of info about intermittent fasting, written in a way
which is easy to understand. Whether you're wondering about side effects or why the scales aren't budging, we've got all you need to know.