Several writers advocate mindful eating and a number of people (@tracieknits, @sallyo) have written about Dr Amanda Sainsbury-Salis' Don't Go Hungry Diet and how her ideas have been useful to them.
There are people for whom mindful eating is revelatory and transformative and I'd be grateful to hear from those people.
There are people for whom this hyperawareness of food and their emotional state would send their chimp/wild child/ego defence into over-drive and the constant logging and checking-in might well drive rebound episodes of over-eating or trigger what Gillian Riley calls the addictive desire to over-eat.
Do we know ourselves and our likely reactions well enough to assess whether mindfulness would work for us from the outset? Or is it something that is amenable to intermittent auditing (so to speak)?
Sallyo wrote: This is an excellent set of ideas to run with along side 5:2. As Tracie says, it's about focusing in on how hungry you are and eating to that measure. One of the things she recommends is scoring your level of hunger before and after eating.
So,before eating you will be
- 0 : not hungry;
- -1 : slightly hungry ( I could wait awhile before eating);
- -2 : quite hungry ( I would like to eat something, a snack or a light meal);
- -3 : very hungry ( I'd like to eat something substantial right now) or
- -4 : Ravenously hungry. ( I could eat anything!)
And then after eating you have to rate your satiety level. So
- +1 : unsatisfied (I still feel a bit hungry and I'd gladly eat something now.)
- +2 : Just satisfied (My body is relaxed an comfortable and if I ate any more I would still feel comfortable but I don't need any more.)
- +3 Elegantly satisfied (My body is relaxed and comfortable but if I ate any more I would begin to feel over satisfied.)
- +4 Over satisfied ( I know in my heart of hearts that I've eaten more than my body wants and I feel uncomfortable)
Amanda argues that those of us who are over weight have lost touch with our bodies and we don't eat to our hunger signals. We eat for other reasons. She recommends keeping a daily food diary - the Success Diary, she calls it, in which you asses your hunger level and satiety level before and after every thing you eat. I have done this over a 3 month period and it did indeed give me insight into my behaviour around food.
She says that when you eat when you are hungry, stop when you've have enough, you will lose weight. Your body loses weight, as has been said here, in steps. You lose, then you maintain, then you lose a bit more. As well as trying to eat when you are hungry, she also advises a diet of non processed foods, as much as possible - so eat fruit but not fruit juice for example, lots of vegetables. Also she believes it's important to eat a big variety of different foods so that you get all the nutrients your body needs. And exercise. So in the food diary, as well as looking at your hunger/satiety levels you also record what you eat so that you can track how much processed food, the range of fruit and veg you are eating.
So it's not about counting calories. It's not about cutting out whole food groups. It's about really focussing in on how your body feels and if you feel like you really want something, that's what you should eat. She talks about junk food which she calls 'fun food', I think and talks about 'having a party in your mouth'. It's ok to do that but you don't want to party all the time. It's a treat, not an everyday thing. [Reformatted from post214623.html?hilit=Amanda%20Sainsbury%20Salis's%20Don't%20Go%20Hungry%20Diet.#p214623]
peebles wrote: @Sallyo, The one issue that arises with the kind of mindful eating that you describe is that people who have something wrong with their blood sugar will be physiologically ravenous shortly after eating, because that is what swiftly moving blood sugars will do to us. So asking, "Am I hungry" gives the answer, "Yes!" And eating just makes it worse.
So I think the issue here is that there are different reasons why people become overweight, and if the problem is comfort eating, emotional eating, this strategy is very helpful. If the problem a metabolic one, it wont' help, and the person often will blame themselves for gluttony because they are getting that continual hunger symptom. There is one last issue which is that some people are heavy because they are abuse survivors and the fat which makes them unattractive keeps them safe. Those people need a whole nother kind of help to be able to diet successfully. [From: post214645.html?hilit=swiftly%20moving%20blood%20sugars%20will%20do%20to%20us#p214645]
There are people for whom mindful eating is revelatory and transformative and I'd be grateful to hear from those people.
There are people for whom this hyperawareness of food and their emotional state would send their chimp/wild child/ego defence into over-drive and the constant logging and checking-in might well drive rebound episodes of over-eating or trigger what Gillian Riley calls the addictive desire to over-eat.
Do we know ourselves and our likely reactions well enough to assess whether mindfulness would work for us from the outset? Or is it something that is amenable to intermittent auditing (so to speak)?