Leonie wrote: I get your point TedE,If I report my friends progress DO NOT READ IT,Simple however if it helps any one out there fair enough!! Point Taken..
I pointed out a fundamental issue with your proposed reports on your friend's progress for the purpose of making sure that people reading this thread were aware of that issue. Thanks for your suggestion that I don't like it, don't read it, but that really doesn't fix the fundamental issue.
My main concern is that people coming here to discuss intermittent fasting are not mislead regarding the efficacy of hypnotherapy. If you do post about the results, perhaps you should do so with the caveat that "We don't know how much of my friend's weight loss is down to intermittent fasting and how much is down to Paul McKenna, it is entirely possible that the weight loss is solely down to intermittent fasting only."
campanula wrote: TedE, have you read any of McKenna's books? Probably the most valuable aspects of his WoE have nothing to do with hypnotherapy (which does work effectively for many people, placebo effect or not).
No, I must admit I have never read any of McKenna's books, nor had I heard of him before his post. I generally don't waste my time paying attention to self appointed weight loss gurus, especially celebrity weight loss gurus.
I must admit I know basically nothing about his WoE. I am more responding to he fact that Mr McKenna's promotional materials claim that "Paul McKenna's Hypnotic Gastric Band is a psychological procedure that can help to convince the unconscious mind that a gastric band has been fitted, so the body behaves exactly as if it were physically present."
HAHA, I know people who've had a real gastric band fitted, I wonder if Mr McKenna's virtual gastric band includes some the side effects inc reflux and vomiting up bread products.
Seriously though, anyone willing to make such ludicrous and outlandish claims regarding the efficacy of hypnosis deserves a wide berth and makes me question the value of his work as a whole. He may make some good points about sensible eating practices, in which case, they are only that and there are hundreds of better ways to get that advice.
campanula wrote: Your reaction strikes me as similar to that of some people to 5:2 who didn't actually watch the documentary or read the book ("that's ridiculous, you'll go in to starvation mode etc etc").
Completely wrong, I am on the side of reason, logic and evidence so far as hypnotherapy by CD goes, the starvation mode crowd is on the side of ignorance and knee jerk reaction.
I have had many people tell me "oh that's not safe", "your metabolism will shut down", "you'll go into starvation mode and gain weight". I have been able to respond to them, citing peer reviewed clinical and empirical research, that IF is safe for most people and effective (eg Vardy, Harvie etc).
On starvation mode, I've been able to say to them that the earliest this has ever been found to happen is after 3 days of total fasting, and even then it was only an 8% drop in metabolic rate, which is hardly going to cause you to pack on pounds:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3661473 . I would also follow this up by telling them some clinical trials have found that your metabolic rate increases by up to 10% during fasts of 36-48 hours in duration
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10837292 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2405717On the other hand, you would be hard pressed to rebut someone who says that Mr McKenna's method is not an effective way of losing weight with credible evidence. In preparing this response, I have had trouble locating credible research on hypnotherapy because there is so much self serving crap put out by professional hypnotherapists. At best what I have found is that one method of in person hypnotherapy (aimed at stress reduction) combined with dietary advice was better than another method of in person hypnotherapy (aimed at lowering caloric intake) combined with dietary advice or a control group of dietary advice alone. HOWEVER, "the benefits were small and clinically insignificant". Hardly a ringing endorsement of hypnotherapy.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9539198I have found no credible scientific research that confirms that prerecorded hypnotherapy is even remotely effective in weight loss.
Leonie wrote: As I said I know of 3 smokers who quit after reading his book & C.D Whats your thoughts about that..Stopping smoking is just as hard as losing weight!!I was only making a comment!

Honeybee27 wrote: I agree that to combine hypnosis with 5:2 would make it difficult to ascertain the effectiveness of either; you wouldn't know which was working to lose the weight. But, hypnosis does work. I know personally of a male hypnotherapist who underwent stomach surgery without any anaesthetic, chatting to the surgeon during the operation! I have used hypnotherapy for pain relief myself, and found it very effective.
SPOILER ALERT: it was the intermittent fasting.
I am sure many people can say "I know so and so and they did this and that with hypnotherapy." Good for them, but that does not establish that any particular method of hypnotherapy is valid, effective, safe or advisable. In this regard, the plural of anecdote is not data.
I will say that my brief search through credible sources seemed to suggest there is some promise in hypnotherapy for pain relief, but the jury is definitely still out. On smoking it appears there is no evidence that hypnotherapy is more effective than any other intervention or no intervention at all
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20927723 .
TedE