Fasting today. The past few weeks I've been having brunch (170cals) and then dinner (300 or less cals), leaving a bit of a fault margin for cals I don't count (herbal tea, garlic, ginger etc for cooking), and the odd time I forget and have a tea with milk.
Decided today to go through without until dinner - regretting that now! Feeling a bit wobbly and light headed (I'm doing this for weight loss rather than 24 hours fasting possible health benefits).
Not much point in giving in no though, only a few hours left unitl dinner......
Which leads me to my point. In theory, I would be v happy with having my usual tuna tomato thingy that I cook, which totals less than 300 cals. Do you think there will be any significant benefit in sticking to this, rather than my 500 allowance?
Off to pick child up from school, will drive carefully!!!
Decided today to go through without until dinner - regretting that now! Feeling a bit wobbly and light headed (I'm doing this for weight loss rather than 24 hours fasting possible health benefits).
Not much point in giving in no though, only a few hours left unitl dinner......
Which leads me to my point. In theory, I would be v happy with having my usual tuna tomato thingy that I cook, which totals less than 300 cals. Do you think there will be any significant benefit in sticking to this, rather than my 500 allowance?
Off to pick child up from school, will drive carefully!!!