I'm hoping the answer may be yes but wouldn't ask if I was confident it is.
On Monday I fasted through breakfast and lunch, had a small dinner but then ice cream for afters and went out for a couple of drinks. So that didn't count as a fast day although I didn't calculate by how much I was over the 500 kcal.
On Tuesday I tried again, fasted through breakfast and lunch, had a small sensible dinner but then later let myself snack on rye crackers, dark chocolate and again ice cream (I blame the weather) and put myself over calorie allowance.
Health-wise I managed ca 22 hour complete fasts both days but then went over on the calories; but even if I ate 1000kcal each day, that's still a "saving" of 2000kcal over the two days so an equivalent of a complete day's fast.
Does it work like that?
If I eat normally today and do a complete liquid fast tomorrow (Thursdays are usually more successful) does that mean I'm back on track for the whole week?
On Monday I fasted through breakfast and lunch, had a small dinner but then ice cream for afters and went out for a couple of drinks. So that didn't count as a fast day although I didn't calculate by how much I was over the 500 kcal.
On Tuesday I tried again, fasted through breakfast and lunch, had a small sensible dinner but then later let myself snack on rye crackers, dark chocolate and again ice cream (I blame the weather) and put myself over calorie allowance.
Health-wise I managed ca 22 hour complete fasts both days but then went over on the calories; but even if I ate 1000kcal each day, that's still a "saving" of 2000kcal over the two days so an equivalent of a complete day's fast.
Does it work like that?
If I eat normally today and do a complete liquid fast tomorrow (Thursdays are usually more successful) does that mean I'm back on track for the whole week?