Reading through Mosley's and Bee's book, "Fast Exercise," early on they reference the following article: Run for your life ... at a comfortable speed and not too far. The article was a footnote to the following:
Take a look at the article -- there's a "sweet spot" at about 30-45 minutes per day, 6-7 miles per hour, 2-5 days per week, where longevity is maximized. Below that range and you die earlier because of the normal sedentary issues, above that range and you die earlier because your heart apparently is not made to take that kind of pressure for that long at high intensities and it deteriorates.
I find this personally very enlightening and positive because a few months ago I happened to stop training for a half-marathon and start targeting a 10km race distance, and to shift some of the calorie burn to walking. After reading this article, and also after reading Mosley's book, I'm thinking I might instead target a 5km race distance, do high-intensity exercises but only for short bursts by incorporating HIIT, and increase my walking distance to get the calorie burn up there so I can continue eating a good amount of food without putting all the weight I lost back on.
I imagine there are those among us who exercise for much longer distances at much higher paces, some marathoners who might be a tad stressed to read this (and not happy like myself who is feeling less-bad for cutting back my distance because for a while I thought I was just making excuses for not wanting to run my long days...).
I am very happy, however, to read the part about joints and running!
Take a look at the article and please comment. Does it seem reasonable to you?
Joint problems are common in impact sports, but oddly enough this is not the case among runners. If anything, running seems to be protective. The risk to runners who overdo it seems to be more from damage to the heart than to the joints.
Take a look at the article -- there's a "sweet spot" at about 30-45 minutes per day, 6-7 miles per hour, 2-5 days per week, where longevity is maximized. Below that range and you die earlier because of the normal sedentary issues, above that range and you die earlier because your heart apparently is not made to take that kind of pressure for that long at high intensities and it deteriorates.
I find this personally very enlightening and positive because a few months ago I happened to stop training for a half-marathon and start targeting a 10km race distance, and to shift some of the calorie burn to walking. After reading this article, and also after reading Mosley's book, I'm thinking I might instead target a 5km race distance, do high-intensity exercises but only for short bursts by incorporating HIIT, and increase my walking distance to get the calorie burn up there so I can continue eating a good amount of food without putting all the weight I lost back on.
I imagine there are those among us who exercise for much longer distances at much higher paces, some marathoners who might be a tad stressed to read this (and not happy like myself who is feeling less-bad for cutting back my distance because for a while I thought I was just making excuses for not wanting to run my long days...).
I am very happy, however, to read the part about joints and running!
Take a look at the article and please comment. Does it seem reasonable to you?