The FastDay Forum

General 5:2 and Fasting Chat

49 posts Page 2 of 4
I just picked what I thought I could get down too. I know I was about 12 stone wghen I had my eldest so it seems reasonable to get there again but it isn't about the numbers for me I will go to maintenance when I think I look ok. My DH will soon tell me if I need to lose or maintain.
Barbarita..

theres a 96 reply thread that i started a month or so ago as i had the same question. or more of a case of realising by original goal weight from April last year was just too low. might be worth reading through as some inspirational stuff in here
5-2-diet-chat-f6/what-is-the-right-target-weight-loss-goal-can-it-be-too-low-t10468.html

it got a bit heated in that thread though which is a shame. but good reading nonetheless

btw still set on 69.0 kg as my goal final weight.. not original one of 68.0 kg. with 69.9 i know im likely to fluctuate from around 68.5 to 70.0 and that i think will be good. basically want to see Libra trend weight as spot on 69.0 and if i see it up to say 69.5 im going to return to full on 4:3 ...well thats the pla

as to how i arrived at this goal weight.. i think its what i was for at least a decade before 2012 when i felt relatively good with my figure
I'm just trying to get back to a weight I feel flatters my frame. I am quite tall so I'd be happy being a comfortable size 10 / small 12. My trousers are getting noticeably looser, even tho the scales dont follow the path I'm wanting them to quickly enough...
I put 10 stone into the Progress Tracker as my goal as that was the weight I was nearly two years ago when I gave up smoking. I put two stone on which is why I'm here now to sort it out. 10 stone would give me a BMI of 22.6, but I will see how my waist/height ratio is then. Since all my fat is stomach fat I have a feeling it won't be at 50% or lower. I was wearing a UK size 12 jeans then but still had a flabby belly. Since for health reasons it is stomach fat which is dangerous, I'd consider going lower to 9st 4 which would give a BMI of 21 - which I have read is 'ideal'. But I'll just see how it goes.
I plucked 65kg out of the air, when I started at 80.7kg, but now I'm over half way there I am thinking perhaps I should go a little further. I'd like to be under 10st, maybe 9st 7 to allow for the feast I'm going to have when I reach my goal, inspired by Gargantua and Pantagruel.
When I started this WOE I was 10st 4lbs and 5' tall. When I got married in 1984 I weighed 7st 12lbs but for most of the next 30 years I've been 8st something. I picked 8st 7lbs as a reasonably healthy weight not too scrawny and not too heavy. I could still lose a bit but I'm not sure that I'm prepared to eat so little. I'm maintaining at the moment and going to see how I feel after a few months.
When I started about a year ago, I picked 137 as a goal. It was about what I weighed in my mid to late 30's when I got pregnant with my daughter. (I had been in 120's in my 20's.) I looked and felt well due to my athletic build. Most importantly, I was looking to dodge the Type 2 diabetes bullet. Once I got there, it just seemed a good thing to go a little lower and have a bit of a safety margin. So, I picked 128-9 out of the air. I didn't really think about saggy skin--probably should have as I'm 65! However, even though it's a bit saggy, it is better than saggy and fat. :razz: I'm at 132 this morning. I feel well, most of my clothes are US size 8. Truly, what I feel like is myself! I feel like I've shed a skin that I grew to deal with stress. The "skin" wasn't me. Now I feel like me. :cool: :heart:
I'm sure you aren't "porky" @loversghost :grin:

Bean :starving:
Thanks for reminding me of your thread @Juliana.rivers, very interesting, but as you say, a bit of a ding-song ensued.

I originally plucked a figure out of the air, but now I'm going to see whether I can get to 120 lbs, which the NHS website assure me is a BMI of 20.5 and healthy for a women of my age who is 5' 4". I know that BMI is a fuzzy number for many reasons, but I'm not exceptionally tall, short or muscular, so it is good enough

If it doesn't feel right then I'll stop at just under 9 stone; but I'll go by how I feel and not by whether anyone, male or female, tells me I look gaunt. When women comment on your weight loss their motives are not always straightforward
. :frown:
I am 63 years old, 5'4" in height and of slight build and at the start of the diet way back last September I weighed 67k and I just thought that 58k seemed a good target weight....one I had been back in my youth. However, when I got to that weight I realised I still had fat to shift, so lowered my target to 54k. I am at 55.5k now and I am aware that 54k would be a good weight for me, leaving some fat 'just in case'. No science in that at all just the 'feel good' factor as far as I am concerned.
Just do what is right for 'your' body. :heart:
nursebean wrote: I'm sure you aren't "porky" @loversghost :grin:

Bean :starving:


That's very kind of you - but I used to think I had a 'large frame' and would be happy at about 11.7 - I got there and found out I haven't got a large frame and I really do still have a lot of 'spare'!!! But I'm not obsessive about - don't care about being thin - just happy to be healthier. But thank you! :smile:
I only picked my goal weight of 11.7 because that's what I was pre children and very physically fit. Think it will make my BMI 24.
I picked 9st 7 as being realistic if nowhere near my lowest weight. I then looked at the Duken ideal weight which said 9st 10[the emails from them seem to have finally stopped]. Then I stalled around 9st 12 and had a rethink, so I removed the goal weight from my tracker and posted else where that I was going to carry on until my birthday and reassess then. I also looked at why I'd stalled and have cut out most of the naughties that were creeping back on ordinary days. The result is I've hit 9st 10 but I need a bit more leeway to allow for life so I am planning to stick to the birthday idea and see how I feel then. To try for my lowest ever weight would be daft at y age- it was around 8st. 9 st. wouldn't be silly but it would probably be unsustainable and require too many new clothes.
I think I'm just confused!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I just assess as I go along. I was aiming to lose about 8 stone but have lost another 8lb after that so weigh in at around 198lb/89kg/14st2lb. I could quite happily lose another half a stone or so but I'm in size 16 (uk) from a 26/28. I'm fitter than I have been in years and have managed to maintain my weight for the last 3 very indulgent weeks :wink: lots of birthdays/baking/eating out! I'm in no rush to drop another dress size (think that would require surgery for the jelly belly! :oops: )
:oops: When I was 14 st plus I just wanted to get to 12 st, my first goal..then achieved 11st, and now 10.11... My target now is 10.7....will I get there who knows but I aim on staying with 5:2 and 16:8 because it works! So a shifting goal for me, but I am happier now with how I feel so it can only get better! X
49 posts Page 2 of 4
Similar Topics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 88 guests

START THE 5:2 DIET WITH HELP FROM FASTDAY

Be healthier. Lose weight. Eat the foods you love, most of the time.

Learn about the 5:2 diet

LEARN ABOUT FASTING
We've got loads of info about intermittent fasting, written in a way which is easy to understand. Whether you're wondering about side effects or why the scales aren't budging, we've got all you need to know.

Your intermittent fasting questions answered ASK QUESTIONS & GET SUPPORT
Come along to the FastDay Forum, we're a friendly bunch and happy to answer your fasting questions and offer support. Why not join in one of our regular challenges to help you towards your goal weight?

Use our free 5:2 diet tracker FREE 5:2 DIET PROGRESS TRACKER & BLOG
Tracking your diet progress is great for staying motivated. Chart your measurements and keep tabs on your daily calorie needs. You can even create a free blog to journal your 5:2 experience!

cron