This is for people who prefer a long fast with just one meal in the evening. I have questions/musings about having milk in coffee on a fast day and the benifits of doing so if having that milk breaks your fast? It's my understanding that having milk in your coffee is breaking your fast, the same as having something to eat. You've essentially put food in your body.
I personally do a long fast, 24 hrs on water and these days black coffee. I've forced myself to get used to black coffee. I actually drink skinny cappuccinos which I love on none fast days and to me is a treat in a mug. But anyway,, from what I have read, the longer the fast the better the results, and it certainly proved so in my first 4 months. I averaged 3/4lbs a week my first 3 months, this dropped to 2/3lbs in my 4th month as I became less strict on weekends.
But my question is, why bother wasting calories in coffee or tea to get you through a long fast if actually you have broken the fast once you have that first milk in your drink? Also that milk if you are going to break your fast could be swapped for a low cal nice healthy snack rather than just milk. For instance, 100g of prawns is only 88 cals and a great source of protien. I used to think that I had a 'splash' of milk, in my coffee, which seems to be the term we all use. My friend and I decided we should test this 'splash'. It actually turned out to be a 1/4 cup 'splash' of skim milk! I wasn't prepared to waste 46 calories in a coffee! Even if you halve this, your coffee with skim milk is pretty dark and not very milky and makes little difference. And if you have 2/3 a day on a fast day that's 69 calories, I'm doubtful most people use that little milk though.
Anyway, food for thought for those who like me do a long fast but don't realise that breaking the fast like this is the same as 2/3 small meals.
I'm not saying anyone should do without coffee and milk if it's getting you through a fast day, but be aware of the calories by actually measuring your milk each time and.... That you have broken your fast once you have that milk.
What's your take on milk in coffee if your a long faster?
I personally do a long fast, 24 hrs on water and these days black coffee. I've forced myself to get used to black coffee. I actually drink skinny cappuccinos which I love on none fast days and to me is a treat in a mug. But anyway,, from what I have read, the longer the fast the better the results, and it certainly proved so in my first 4 months. I averaged 3/4lbs a week my first 3 months, this dropped to 2/3lbs in my 4th month as I became less strict on weekends.
But my question is, why bother wasting calories in coffee or tea to get you through a long fast if actually you have broken the fast once you have that first milk in your drink? Also that milk if you are going to break your fast could be swapped for a low cal nice healthy snack rather than just milk. For instance, 100g of prawns is only 88 cals and a great source of protien. I used to think that I had a 'splash' of milk, in my coffee, which seems to be the term we all use. My friend and I decided we should test this 'splash'. It actually turned out to be a 1/4 cup 'splash' of skim milk! I wasn't prepared to waste 46 calories in a coffee! Even if you halve this, your coffee with skim milk is pretty dark and not very milky and makes little difference. And if you have 2/3 a day on a fast day that's 69 calories, I'm doubtful most people use that little milk though.
Anyway, food for thought for those who like me do a long fast but don't realise that breaking the fast like this is the same as 2/3 small meals.
I'm not saying anyone should do without coffee and milk if it's getting you through a fast day, but be aware of the calories by actually measuring your milk each time and.... That you have broken your fast once you have that milk.
What's your take on milk in coffee if your a long faster?