Good point Mari4715! And with Caroline's correction about working off the TDEE of the weight you are
now, I agree with everything you say.
Dr M and Mimi's fast diet is successful because it is
so simple to describe, in fact it takes about 20 seconds (or less, can someone come up with the fastest description that conveys all you need to know?) Once you start talking about TDEE a whole level of complication arises which would put many people off. So I understand them not mentioning it and I think it was the right decision.
Nevertheless TDEE matters because of the calories in / calories out - we can't get around the basic laws of physics.
I have occasionally felt frustrated here (and maybe let it show sorry

) when people say 'eat more on your feed days to lose more weight', because I think it is exactly what most of us want to hear and shall we say it is 'open to misinterpretation'.
There may be a truth behind it though. I suspect that intermittent fasting (IF) works by allowing your metabolism to run at full pace on normal days and then a slight reduction on fasting days, whereas your body is likely to respond to continuous calorie restriction (CR) by lowering your metabolic rate. So for a given intake of calories over a week IF might well work better than CR for weight loss, because the energy consumption will be higher.
If you are following IF but reduce your eating on normal days below your TDEE this might start to reduce your metabolism and thus your energy burn, and then you have just made it harder for yourself to lose weight. If this is the case, then 'eating more on normal days' might be good advice.
But the big point is that eating on average above your TDEE on normal days will reduce, eliminate or even reverse any weight loss benefits from the fast days. This is not to say you can't go over it on occasion - it's just the average that matters.
Almost everything I have written above I have picked up from this forum BTW - what a great place it is! Any mistakes of course are purely my own...