carorees wrote: That's odd because when I filter by my characteristics it comes up with 1 member, who presumably must be me, but the data don't match my stats. I wonder if it is something to do with the time on the diet? I should be in the 3-6 month category as I started on 5th November but perhaps the way the tracker calculates the time is not per calendar month?
Just explaining this seeming discrapancy so that people don't think the stats are all wrong...
I don't know why I didn't realise sooner what the answer to Caroline's question was

Basically, the length of time on the diet was the issue here. The tracker bases this time on the start date provided compared with the last date any progress was logged for that user. This is to ensure that the data doesn't end up scewed if people stop using the tracker - otherwise it might appear they had been on the diet for months/years with relatively little loss. Hope that makes sense

Anyway, in this case, although Caroline has technically been doing 5:2 a little over 3 months, due to the way the system averages months out to 30 days rather than calendar months, and the fact that her last data entry was a few days ago, her total time calculates as 2.9 months and therfore doesn't show up in the data she had expected it to. Next time she adds data to the tracker she should find this changes

Hope that explains things clearly for anyone who was wondering. It's not a fault in the tracker, just an 'anti data scew' mechanism, if you will!