Hi wildmissus
I mentioned your thread on a food forum I'm a member of - and it received some very negative (not to say ill-informed!) reactions:
http://www.wildfood.info/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9357&p=243527&sid=6479311cba4ed2808ea472e329d6cb33#p243527I give my response to these comments further down the page.
“I think I would be very worried about the motivation of people who get obsessive about any sort of diet. I've read that intermittent fasting isn't suitable for people who have had issues with things like anorexia or bulimia in the past (not that I'm suggesting you have) as it encourages bad eating habits, and if people are prepared to go longer and longer without food, and look on it as a source of pride, or competition, then I can see why.”
“If you do 36 hours without food it is no longer the 5:2 which is the tried, tested, & medically approved regime
It's a fad
Sorry to be so blunt but I think it is barking mad - it's not a kiddie dare "how far (or how long) can you go", it should be a sustainable and safe method of eating for life”
“I saw the thread about a 36 hour fast. It's not for me. In fact, I think the concept could do more damage to 5:2 and could lead to it being totally dismissed by the media as engendering eating 'disorders'. After all, it's still in its infancy and there are many who have already poo pooed it.”
A bit of light relief for all you 36ers as you fast tomorrow.
I'm restricted by my wife, ATM, as I said earlier, but I shall try and keep my calories down under 200 tomorrow - that in itself will be some sort of victory!
But good luck and best wishes to all fasters tomorrow - I'll be with you in spirit (and watching this thread grow, no doubt about that!).
Cheers, B&W